What to include

01

Existing work

Which technology, standard, paper, company, or architecture already addresses the proposed gap?

02

Incorrect assumptions

Which claim is wrong, incomplete, unsafe, or likely to fail in practice?

03

Next experiment

What should Atlas build or test first to validate or falsify the thesis?

Public review through GitHub Reviews submitted as GitHub issues remain visible, discussable, and traceable as the research changes.
Submit review on GitHub

Suggested review format

Paper or page:
Area of expertise:
Summary of concern:
Specific claim or section:
Existing technology or prior art:
Why this matters:
Recommended correction or experiment:
References:

Do not include confidential, proprietary, personal, or security-sensitive information in a public GitHub issue.